Casio EX-FH20BK Digital SLR Camera
April 7th, 2010 | by admin |
Casio’s new EX-FH20 EXILIM digital camera is great for ultra-fast picture recording, and Sam is here to tell you why in this video demonstration. Sam shows how the Casio EX-FH20 takes 40 photos per second and video up to 1000 frames per second.
Check out the great shot of the waterfall Sam shot to see how the detail in the cascading water is retained in this very short glimpses into time.
The Casio EX-FH20 Digital Camera’s 20x zoom makes it the ideal camera for sports and outdoor photography. In addition to beautiful still images, the Casio EX-FH20 Digital Camera is capable of capturing slow-motion video at up to 1,000 fps.
Available for purchase from:
TigerDirect: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4552139&CatId=3623
CompUSA: http://www.compusa.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4552139&CatId=3623
Circuit City: http://www.circuitcity.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4552139
Duration : 0:3:36
[youtube 2Trkp39Rfl4]
25 Responses to “Casio EX-FH20BK Digital SLR Camera”
By TAKE0N0IMAGES on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
NOT an “SLR”- …
NOT an “SLR”- Single Lens Reflex. Digital SLR’s have interchangeable Lenses.
By TheMan1510 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
damn, she’s hot
damn, she’s hot
By soulsurvivor52784 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
huh?
huh?
By kreeddem on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
2:31
2:31
By kreeddem on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
lol t the words ” …
lol t the words “over all” 2:33
By Peepintom234 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
We will ignore …
We will ignore you’re stupid comments.
By ludog014 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
wow, aren’t you the …
wow, aren’t you the cool kid, not spelling words correctly, and saying you know alot about computers, (also, if you know anything on how to put a computer together, you are most likely considered a nerd.) Just off man. If you don’t like the show don’t watch it, F-tard! (god, i didn’t know they made people this daft)
By CaptMorgasm on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
Hope he teaches you …
Hope he teaches you how to spell to.
By thegreatzuzu on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
…
AHHAHAHAAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHA @ the end “ahh im all itchy” hahahahahahah someones been getting freaky
By Saaduk92 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
Overcranking is a …
Overcranking is a type of slow motion capture.
By realredfox on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
I don’t know what …
I don’t know what the you are talking about… if you capture 1000 frames per second you can capture an event which takes like 1 second and play it back at 25 fps, which will virtually stretch it to 40 seconds, allowing you to see something you wouldn’t see because it’s going on too fast in 1 second…
those aren’t ment to be played back at 1000 frames per second… but 1 second captured with this will be played for 40 seconds at 25fps… smooth slomo… that’s what slow motion is.
By eNLivEx on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
You are wrong, so …
You are wrong, so because movies and TV is displayed in 24.blah FPS you are saying that because it is a consant FPS it will look the same as 60? I can notice a difference in TV and games. The FPS tends to be to make the files smaller and of course recieving the data a lot easier back in the day when it was hard to transmit TV. 24 FPS is fine and looks fine but when compared to a game running at 60 you can see the difference.
By Saaduk92 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
@ GCVos
As …
@ GCVos
As mentioned before, usually Overcranking captures are usually done by recording at 48fps instead of the standard 24, as that’s what most films and TV shows are recorded at these days.
By Saaduk92 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
@ eNLivEx
The …
@ eNLivEx
The human eye sees 24 fps and up as “smooth”. The reason gamers deem this as unplayable is because consistent frame rates are a rarity, so we’ll be able to see choppy gameplay because it would drop below 24 frequently.
Many TV shows(and TV sets) display at 24fps or 25fps as that’s all that is needed for us to see things “smoothly”. We don’t see any choppy footage because it’s a consistent smooth frame rate and doesn’t fluctuate like video games.
By Saaduk92 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
@ realredfox
I was …
@ realredfox
I was reflecting upon it from a video maker’s POV, but if you want to talk about slow motion captures then fine.
It won’t be useful for that too, when people are doing Overcranking catpures they usually do up the frame rates from the standard 24 to 48. Getting one for a thousand would be a waste of money, as barely anyone would use it.
By eNLivEx on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
Why can you not …
Why can you not speak English? Stop asking questions.
By eNLivEx on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
3:15
3:15
By eNLivEx on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
24 up? So your …
24 up? So your saying from 24 to 60 looks the same? wha- it’s for slow motion
By hootis8 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
? why is she in the …
? why is she in the middle of no ware
By GCVos on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
Have you even heard …
Have you even heard of slow-motion?
By realredfox on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
what the are …
what the are you talking about?
do you even realize that those 1000 fps are ment to be used for slow motion captures?
By gottn211 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
I like 70 fps, then …
I like 70 fps, then it’s super smooth. over that, no diffirences
By brandon20904 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
are they really …
are they really comparing this to 2 mega pixels? Really? even cellphones have better cameras.
By Saaduk92 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
I do.
LCD monitors …
I do.
LCD monitors can only display 60-120.
Old CRT’s go up to 200, and TV’s go anywhere from 25 to 200, depending on model and price and all that.
The other 800 would be useless. Plus our eye sees 24 and up as smooth =/
By virokill132 on Apr 7, 2010 | Reply
you dont know that
you dont know that