<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: what is the best digital cameras&#8217; reviews web site?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrcameltoepic.com/digital-camera-reviews/what-is-the-best-digital-cameras-reviews-web-site/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrcameltoepic.com/digital-camera-reviews/what-is-the-best-digital-cameras-reviews-web-site</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:30:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fhotoace</title>
		<link>http://www.mrcameltoepic.com/digital-camera-reviews/what-is-the-best-digital-cameras-reviews-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-5285</link>
		<dc:creator>fhotoace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrcameltoepic.com/digital-camera-reviews/what-is-the-best-digital-cameras-reviews-web-site#comment-5285</guid>
		<description>http://www.dpreview.com and any photography online magazine like the American Photographer or Popular Photography.  The professional Rangefinder Magazine is very reliable when it comes to camera evaluations.

In the end, professional evaluations are much more objective than users opinions which only tend to show the short-comings of the users skill using any camera, not the quality of the camera itself&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;digiPro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com</a> and any photography online magazine like the American Photographer or Popular Photography.  The professional Rangefinder Magazine is very reliable when it comes to camera evaluations.</p>
<p>In the end, professional evaluations are much more objective than users opinions which only tend to show the short-comings of the users skill using any camera, not the quality of the camera itself<br /><b>References : </b><br />digiPro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

